Bug#702329: RFS update
Hi,
I don't plan to sponsor this package, but here is one comment:
On 06/20/2013 11:34, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> igtf-policy-classic - IGTF classic profile for Authority Root Certificates
> igtf-policy-experimental - IGTF experimental Authority Root Certificates
> igtf-policy-mics - IGTF MICS profile for Authority Root Certificates
> igtf-policy-slcs - IGTF SLCS profile for Authority Root Certificates
> igtf-policy-unaccredited - IGTF unaccredited Authority Root Certificates
Why are these multiple binary packages? I would assume they should just
be installed into different locations.
A sponsor should check the integrity of the certificates. How could he
do this?
Ansgar
Reply to: