On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Richard Ulrich wrote: > > > The problem I'm facin is that I don't know how to handle the fact > > > that I want to build debug and release with cmake. > > > > I think you should instead drop the debug build, those aren't shipped > > in Debian usually. > > That's not really what I want. The packages I'm building (richbool and > modassert) are mainly concerned with providing information about failed > asserts in debug code. So the debug builds are actually more important > than the release ones. Are release builds still necessary then? > I'm even considering to make the librichbool-dev package depend on the > librichbool-dbg package. Note that -dbg packages usually contain only detached debug symbols, and you seem to build two separate libraries with the same soname but different compilation options and package them into libfoo and libfoo-dbg, is that true? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature