Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi again Slavko,
Le 16/07/12 11:58, Slavko a écrit :
>> Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers
>> (team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to
>> debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I personally
>> answer my own RFS with a [ping] message every month or so, just
>> to show I'm still there, waiting for a sponsor.
>
> I tried post to electronics team, but without any reply. I am
> confused with these pings now - after the sponsorship-request
> pseudo package was introduced (and RFS bugreports) i understand,
> that there are no pings needed.
You're right, that why I'm not saying you should send them. It may be
considered harassment by some sponsors, I don't know. I still send
~monthly pings, and each time try to rephrase why I think it's good to
have the package and I try to send it to other people who may want to
sponsor it.
> Another confusion is about the existing RFS bugreport now. It will
> be closed and new one must be created? Or after new upload i will
> only need to post reply to existing bug? Is this somewhere
> documented, please?
There is no reason why it would be closed automatically, just answer
it. IF it is closed, reopen it. IF it is retitled, retitle it back.
In short, as long as your reasonable and don't spam people, it's OK to
insist. Being stubborn is not a bad thing :-) Put your heart into it,
document in your RFS the fact that you have been effectively
maintaining the package for three years already...
Also, move on: take care of other packages, find a good sponsor to
whom you can then personally ask to review nbc. Enter the NM process,
become a DD and then you can finally upload it yourself if everything
else fails...
Kind regards, Thibaut.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQBAmJAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAxLMQANjCzhURYhylUonT8GY/FNZf
jN0pj3VSpv92K5iZx5aGhdCHH4EH1tzcMN9gnOmJMK6KCZYl32CcB/0QbdcUWKhz
azL+Uf43y+kanCLup5vwv3+BMZMnIQX8lxarotfazZNT9Ux0ouG5PIynQ2o36pLN
JuBzPgdSNi4bFXiQocM+YFj7W77jzbCdy4Q83J2WV9JC6HhTyzspnPFQVsf46uZs
ATbVSYvZv+DXzbNYtb+WLdjKymEUVbOa+Z9fTPER4KMn3Kw6f139i1nfbWlPuDMD
wPVPtQzv+M0Q68YnNrgaOpJJxrOUS64cbbcX3NXWyd9vd+3uXePQdfW88m2HSh0y
Xqu8PHkpgiBv72+RqQRAWq53Sr64XuQfs2jGLHTItl6VPaoXGHcbObnOSZgiWKOy
pxVxYjWPwDmzHlq+IL8hKod0dHfYJk5H1h5gue1rFmC4+8y1J9ZDy7ko7X6r4IgH
AstDzIYsQXHuXZhClEBj2W73+YnEsUhRlJeOtAsE6COtJqhj21P+BnjeXUVNwTMm
jBPFQ48QdmEcEqEnxfuSEWgSJOsZMswxlrZ2adyrciUWMXtIYje8PGT1J4b/GgYN
KNbJ0j0309o50o+UlE8hG2t9UVPFZ4McaF/uEb02mAW+aBbrTIKzgbHYKPexilM1
/sJEUnPNq5alNx4CiLEX
=sqCx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: