On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:01:52AM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 13 May 2012 21:45:10 -0400 > Paul Tagliamonte <tag@pault.ag> wrote: > > > * Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override > > you've got in there, since you can have some problems on upgrade, etc. > > How it that going to help? It's build-time thing, it doesn't matter, I > guess. It was late, you're right. Well, you're wrong, but you're right. The *real* reason not to use this is because it's really more for end-users and sysadmins, like dpkg-divert. It'd add a dpkg entry that the package shouldn't be shipping, and chmod is right. My bad. > > > * You should also consider using DEP5 for your copyright. > > May be or may not be needed. It's optional at this moment, so I don't > use it widely (yet). It's in the packaging manual, and it's been accepted. You should be taking it more seriously. It's perhaps not a requirement, but it's a good thing to have. > > -- > WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature