Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1

[Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>]

On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
>> >> Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > Sorry, my mistake, this should have been "Hi Thomas".
>>
>> Hi Bart,
>>
>> No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename?
>>
>> Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of
>> dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a
>> minimal system (with Python).
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
> http://0install.net/install-source.html
> http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2
>
> I have not yet looked any further than that.

I can rename it if necessary (1.12 will have the new name upstream),
but I don't think this needs to hold up the Debian package split, does
it?

Note that this bug is linked from the front page of
http://0install.net ("we need a sponsor from Debian to approve the
change") if you need confirmation that upstream agrees with the
rename.

Thanks,


-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA