Re: Backporting a multi-arched package
Helmut Grohne wrote on 2012-07-25 16:31:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Now you make me wonder. Please explain why this is needed. The original
> question mentioned that the package in question is "Multi-Arch:
> foreign". I do not see an issue with having Multi-Arch:foreign headers
I understood: "remove of Multi-Arch" for which I wrote the documentation:
> > - backport the package reversing the multiarch stuff ?
But for the special field "Multi-Arch: foreign" you could be right.
I never have tested this.
---
Have a nice day.
Joachim (Germany)
Reply to: