Bug#677013: RFS: time
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:21:09PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I've reviewed the latest version of your packaging, and I'd be happy to
> upload it. Thank you very much for all the work that you've put into the
> package. Unwinding all the of the patches into quilt format in particular
> is quite impressive (and I suspect will make it easier for other
> distributions or an eventual new GNU maintainer).
>
> Bart and Sandro, I don't want to jump in if you would like to be the
> sponsor and don't want to step on other people. If you're okay with me
> sponsoring this package going forward, though, I'm happy to do so.
It is OK for me that you sponsor this package.
>
> Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> writes:
> > Bart Martens wrote:
>
> >> The file debian/copyright "should name the original authors", and
> >> David Keppel is such an author.
>
> > Thank you for taking the time to look at the copyright file in detail.
> > I admit the new DEP5 format confuses me. I need to find some actual
> > examples in the field of more than the very simple examples listed in
> > the documentation. I am working from this document:
>
> > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
>
> You should instead use:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>
> not that this would resolve your question, since there isn't anywhere in
> the format to record authors who do not hold copyright.
Then this copyright format is not suitable for writing debian/copyright files
that fully conform to debian-policy.
> As mentioned in
> my other message, I don't think this is really the purpose of the
> debian/copyright file.
Debian-policy is clear on the purpose of debian/copyright. It states "should
name the original authors".
> What you have now seems fine to me.
Not to current debian-policy.
Regards,
Bart Martens
Reply to: