[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#661975: RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs

Hallo Sandro,

uploaded to d-m. 
* undid wrap-and-sort
* Patches are attached to the relevant BTS entries.
* Filed the 3rd RC bug (FTBFS reg. libgearman)
* no other changes made to the package.


Am Sonntag, den 04.03.2012, 11:05 +0100 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 09:24, Tobias Frost <tobi@frost.de> wrote:
> > Hallo Sanrdo,
> > thanks for your response. I'll add the patches to the BTS.
> >
> > Note: Clynt (the current maintainer) asked me in a response to one the
> > BTS entries fixes (#6318020) to include his changes from his VCS as
> > well:
> >
> > Am Freitag, den 02.03.2012, 23:55 -0800 schrieb Clint Byrum:
> >> Thanks, I have not been able to spend much time on gearman-interface
> >> lately. Thanks for the heads up. Note that the Vcs-Bzr in the package
> >> is more or less correct, and you may want to consider tacking my
> > pending
> >> changes on top of this as one of them is an RC bug fix.
> Vcs-Bzr is not correctly set:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596794
> > I think this would be best for the quality of package, but isn't
> > strictly NMU anymore (could also include other changes -- did not check
> > yet).
> > Would this OK be with you?
> No, it 's not ok: you're preparing a NMU, so it has to be the smallest
> possible diff to fix the RC bugs. so what you need to do is provide
> for an updated package on mentors with the requested changes and to
> send the debdiff to the involved bug reports (that's a NMU rule);
> after that, all the additional work is more then welcome but unrelated
> to the NMU and not required (i.e. I won't uploaded with spurious
> changes, like those I mentioned before).

That's why I asked. 

> Please let me know when an updated package is available.
> Regards,

Reply to: