[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Providing a non-free alternative to a free package

Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@googlemail.com> writes:
> So I'd suggest name the free one slalib and the other one
> slalib-nonfree or vice versa (like the unrar example).

The problem is that I want the dependent programs to be linked against
any of them. 

For example "saods9" would use slalib as a shared library, and I want to
git the user a choide to run it either with the free, or with the
non-free version.



Reply to: