Re: RFS: ipset
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
> wouldn't it be more reasonable to use 3.0.y as the next Debian stable
> release's kernel?
>
> I mean, sure, if many of the other major Linux distributions, the ones
> which can be considered as peers to Debian in terms of importance,
> collectively decide to use a different, later kernel version for their
> next stable release, it would make sense to use that kernel for
> Debian's next stable release of course, since it allows the effort of
> maintaining the kernel to be shared between distributions (at least to
> some extent). But, failing that, why not use the one that has the
> imprimatur of the existing defacto stable kernel maintainer?
Please refer to this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg00006.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html
If you have more questions about that, please ask the Debian Linux kernel team.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: