Re: Fwd: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose <email@example.com> wrote:
> Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
> from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
> found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the
Sure, that was my real goal anyway; gcc-4.5 just looked lonely without
its documentation, and it didn't seem like it would be much more work
to do them both than to just do gcc-4.6.