I think a single source package with multiple binary packages would make more sense.
i agree, but until now i didn't find how to do it, so it is same as dh_install: if really required, i will need someone to do it for me.
What is python-distutils-extra build-dependency for?
removed.
You have empty Suggests, Recommend etc. fields in debian/control. Just remove them.
XB-Python-Version is deprecated, remove it.
done
Don't use "Provides: ${python:Provides}" unless you know what you're doing.
removed.
Licence and copyright of glade2script.py is not documented in debian/copyright.
done.
I also added another one (MIT) in the copyright of boot-repair.
Various scripts create temporary files in an insecure way.
which ones ?
- You should remove *.egg-info from binary packages, they are useless or this package.
removed.
- This setup.py creates an .installed_file, which you didn't remove in the clean target.
removed.
With informative and experimental tags enabled, I get:
X: boot-repair source: python-depends-but-no-python-helper boot-repair
X: boot-sav-gui source: python-depends-but-no-python-helper boot-sav-gui
X: boot-sav source: python-depends-but-no-python-helper boot-sav
X: clean-ubiquity source: python-depends-but-no-python-helper clean-ubiquity
X: os-uninstaller source: python-depends-but-no-python-helper os-uninstaller
i don't understand these ones. help!
E: boot-sav-gui: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/share/boot-sav/glade2script.py
added "python" and "python-gtk2" dep for boot-sav-gui package.
I updated the packages (same download links). Thanks again, i'm learning a lot.
Yann