[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: apt-spy




Paul Wise  at "Mon, 26 Dec 2011 09:32:20 +0800" wrote:
 PW> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Stefano Canepa wrote:

 >> All code is on github but I don't use git for the debian part.

 PW> Please note that native packages should have debian/ packaging in
 PW> their VCS and make a new release for every change to debian/, however
 PW> minor.

 PW> Please mention the VCS info in the upstream tarball somewhere. HACKING
 PW> or README.devel or something.

 PW> About github, you might want to switch to collab-maint instead:

 PW> http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html

 >> I think that apt-spy would be usefull only on Debian. Do you suggest to
 >> describe in the changelog?

 PW> If you are going to switch packaging formats, I think that is a good
 PW> idea to mention why in the changelog.

Ok.

 >>  PW> #515515 is not the kind of bug that should be closed in a changelog.
 >>
 >> OK, I'll correct it

 PW> The bug should simply be closed, mentioning your RFS mail.

 PW> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing

I'll follow your suggestion.

 PW> Also, do you have any comment on this mail? The original author
 PW> expressed a desire to get involved with development of apt-spy again.
 PW> Please contact them and see if they are still interested:

 PW> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/11/msg00432.html

I mailed him and waiting for reply.

 PW> In my reply to that mail I suggested collab-maint (or alioth in
 PW> general) as the place to host apt-spy:

 PW> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/11/msg00445.html

 >>  PW> W: apt-spy: latest-debian-changelog-entry-changed-to-native

 PW> This one can be ignored if you intended to switch to a native package.
 PW> It will go away for the upload after the one switching to native

Ok, as I think switiching to native make sense I'll do all my best to
create a correct native package.

After your previous email I contacted monit authors to solve the
licensing problem. One of them replyed he has no problem if I use these
three methods even releasing they code with BSD license as the rest of
apt-spy. Do you think I need to wait for all three to reply? Do I need
to include the message somewhere? And if yes where is it appropriate? In
the README?

Thanks again for your help. 

Bye
Stefano

-- 
Stefano Canepa aka sc: sc@linux.it - http://www.stefanocanepa.it
Three great virtues of a programmer: laziness, impatience and hubris.
Le tre grandi virtù di un programmatore: pigrizia, impazienza e
arroganza. (Larry Wall)


Reply to: