Re: RFS: fizsh
Hi Michael,
Thanks for looking at my package again.
> - why not fix the hyphen-used-as-minus-sign via a patch instead of overriding
> the warning? Overriding a correct warning for the mere reason of silencing
> lintian seems to be of no use.
I first tried to create a patch, but I could not add it in a correct way.
Then I thought that arguments to commands (such as "-a" in "ls -a")
start with hyphens, and not with minus signs, so that lintian was
actually wrong. I may be wrong about this though. Anyway for this
reason I added a "lintian-override" file.
I will add working patch in the next upload.
> - The tar.gz file differs in the same way it did before. Why don't you use
> exactly the file that can be downloaded from sf.net?
I am very sorry. It is only now that I see that this is due to a bug
in a script I used. This bug will not be present in the next upload.
Best wishes,
Guido
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Michael Tautschnig <mt@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
>> Dear Michael, and other mentors,
>>
>> Thank you very much for reviewing my package!
>>
>> I corrected the errors you spotted. I also added a "lintian-override"
>> file to suppress the lintian "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" tag. (This
>> "override-file" will not be needed anymore when Upstream releases a
>> newer version of fizsh.)
>>
> [...]
>
> I understand that you fixed some of these errors, but
>
> - why not fix the hyphen-used-as-minus-sign via a patch instead of overriding
> the warning? Overriding a correct warning for the mere reason of silencing
> lintian seems to be of no use.
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
>
Reply to: