Re: RE : : RFS: autoconf-archive (updated package)
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Kilian Krause <kilian@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:34 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> I have done the work needed
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kilian Krause <kilian@debian.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Bastien,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> >> Ping ?
>> >
>> > 1. debian/watch needs fixing to avoid your ugly epoch hack:
>> > opts="uversionmangle=s/[-\.]//g" \
>> > is the correct way to update
>>
>> Done
>>
>> > 2. DEP5 is now at
>> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?view=markup&pathrev=174
>> > Please update in debian/copyright
>>
>> Done
>>
>> > 3. Lintian still warns about:
>> > E: autoconf-archive source: git-patches-not-exported
>> > P: autoconf-archive source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt
>> >
>> > Which seems to be correct as debian/patches is empty except for
>> > debian/patches/series.
>> > Do you reckon that there should be no patches at all or are they plain
>> > missing in your source?
>>
>> They are no patches. It is a bug in gitpkg even after david Bremner
>> patch lintian complain.
>
> Renamed to the proper version without epoch, built, signed, uploaded.
>
> I've not "fixed" the unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt warning of lintian, but
> maybe that could be part of the gitpkg "fix" that would only ship
> debian/patches (including debian/patches/series) if it's really required
> and also ship the quilt-b-dep if it's really required. It may very well
> be that it's not even required due to the dpkg-source v3.
> Thanks for your contribution!
Thanks to you
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Kilian
>
Reply to: