On 07/08/2011 09:31 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: >> On 07/07/2011 10:43 PM, Paul Wise wrote: >> >>> There is one lintian warning: >>> >>> I: libpar2-0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libpar2.so.0.0.1 >> >> Ups, yes. Symbols file added. > [...] >> Thanks for checking the package, a new version should be available at >> the mentors.debian.net and in the git-repository at alioth. > > sorry, but FTBFS for me: > http://people.debian.org/~kilian/libpar2_0.2-2_i386.build Urgs, yeah, seems I need arch-specific symbols files. Currently libpar2 exports way too many symbols, >80% aren't needed anyway. It's on my radar to reduce that and properly mark private what should be private, but it's part of a bigger rewrite. So, would it be acceptable to upload the package with DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=0 to get the package built on all arches and then provide the symbols files as needed? (I don't have access to all arches to generate the initial symbols file myself). Or, what would be even easier, I could just ignore the lintian warning for now, file a wishlist bug against the package once it's built and go from there with the (future) cleaned up api? > And just for the record, is #532041 part of your patches? Sounds a bit like > it from the changelog entry. Please add a matching Closes if is the case. Aye. Thanks, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature