Re: RFS: wmmixer

[Rodolfo kix Garcia <kix@kix.es>]

On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:48:22 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> [...]
> > >- Why have urgency=low QA (group) upload in the first line when you
> > >are doing a proper upload?
> >
> > Lintian detects the package as orphan and then shows the warning. If
> > I try to write
> > "QA (group) upload" in the first line (alone), lintian shows other
> > warning.
> > I don't know how to avoid the lintian warning. What should I do?
> > IMHO the lintian
> > warning message cannot be solved.
> >
> > >- Aren't you adopting this package? At least #490739 appears to
> > >say so.
> >
> > I am trying to do that.
>
> I think both the non-QA-upload and lintian warning will be fixed by
> closing this
> particular ITA bug in the changelog properly.
>
> [...]
> > >Furthermore, why did you bump the debhelper build dependency to 7.0
> > >when at the same time not making use of its new simplified
> > >debian/rules?
> >
> > I cannot find the info to rewrite the debian/rules to 7.0
> > What are the differences? When can I found docs about it.
>
> Please take a look at, e.g.,
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debhelper
>
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/cdbs_killer___40__design_phase__41__/
>
> Hope this helps,
> Michael

Hi Michael,

thanks a lot, very nice documentation.

I changed the rules file except for "binary-arch", because I don't know
how to move the CHANGES file and the example file to the destination
folder. I created two new patches, for the debian paths and the g++
optimization. Before the patches, the rules file includes this 
information
as paramenter (make install /usr and CXXPARM = "xxx"). I think this is 
the best
solution.

The Maintainer filed was changed to adopt the package and the lintian 
problem
has gone. Now the package is lintian clean.

Can you check the package again.

Thanks a lot for your time.

Best Regards,

kix.
--
||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia
||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/