Re: RFS: phing (Another try)
Le Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
> Kilian Krause wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> > > Nicolas wrote:
> > > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same.
> > >
> > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License
> > > paragraph.
> >
> > actually you may be interested in the base-files package having
> > /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3
> > which would make a reference to that file sufficient IMHO.
>
> I was referring to the Apache and Expat licenses, that do not have a
> stand-alone License section at all, in violation of DEP-5. You're
> absolutely right about referring to the common-licenses files instead of
> including the full text of the license, but a stand-alone License
> paragraph is still required in that case.
Hello everybody,
By the way, there is an excellent DEP 5 parser and validator packaged in
Debian. I recommend to read the following article.
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/debian-copyright-dep5-parsereditorvalidatormigrator-is-released/
Have a nice Sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: