Re: ITS: triggerhappy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-10 22:51, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dies schrieb Niels Thykier (niels@thykier.net):
>
Hi
>> debian/copyright says it its GPL-3 or any later, but the license header
>> in the source files merely say:
>>
>> """
>> You have permission to copy, modify, and redistribute under the
>> terms of the GPL. For full license terms, see COPYING.
>> """
>>
>> Looking at COPYING, I see a GPL-3 license. Please see the "How to Apply
>> These Terms to Your New Programs" in COPYING on an example of how to
>> correct this.
>> Legal stuff is unfortunately very pedantic and d/copyright must
>> reflect what is in the upstream sources.
>
>
> OK, being upstream myself, I clarified the statement in the source files to
> refer to GPLv3 specificly.
>
To say "GPLv3" or "GPLv3 or any later"? (I did not check the tarball for
the reasons listed below)
>> Secondly, the package has two debian-changes patches in debian/patches.
>
> These changes were an accident produced by git-buildpackage; on my build
> system, the upstream branch was not correctly checked out at HEAD, so the
> changes were detected relative to the debian branch.
>
>> There is a newer Standards-Version 3.9.2, please update accordingly.
>
> OK, I just ran an update to make sure my local tools are recent; since my
> build/sign system is running stable, I might encounter a few warning messages
> there.
>
Generally it is expected that you build the package in a clean chroot
and I strongly recommend you use a recent version of lintian when you
check your package as well.
>> The changelog file contains a lot of entries and some of them suggests
>> you have had an unofficial repository from where your users could
>> download this package. If that is the case, please move the entry that
>> closes #603842 to the newest changelog entry[1].
>
> OK, I just updated the changelog to reflect this.
>
> Thank you very much for your input, I hope you'll revisit my package as soon as
> I uploaded the new version.
>
I tried to re-fetch your package, but dpkg-source refuses to unpack it
because the tarball has a different size than what is expected(/written
in the .dsc). Not sure what happened, but according to the directory
listing on mentors.debian.net[1], the orig.tar.gz is from March and the
dsc is from today.
Perhaps, you have to remove the package from mentors and re-upload it
again?
~Niels
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/triggerhappy/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Wy7H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: