Re: RFS: qastools
On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht <email@example.com> wrote:
> Sebastian H. wrote:
>> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
>> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
>> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
>> > the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
>> The short answer is, it makes package maintenance much easier and
>> is less error prone.
> I see the point of having one source package for all the tools, but you
> could still make several binary packages from there (as alsa-tools does,
> though not for every single utility I must admit).
What's the size of these packages? what's their dependencies?
A quick look from here looks like they are qtgui apps that uses