Re: debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the
>> > activiz.net package, see:
>> >
>> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/activiz.net/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup
>> >
>> > However the -indep rules are still being called on the buildd machine:
>> >
>> > Eg:
>> >
>> > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=activiz.net&arch=s390x&ver=5.6.1-2&stamp=1320869304
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Am I missing something here ?
>>
>> This is one of the real issue behind the optional build-arch/build-indep
>> targets; since they are optional dpkg-buildpackage/buildds do not use
>> them. Therefore, you cannot rely on them as a maintainer (yet).
> [...]
>
> Agreed with all Niels comments. Your source package is fine; the issue
> is that dpkg-buildpackage (run by sbuild on the buildds) calls:
>
> debian/rules build
> debian/rules binary-arch
>
> when it should be running
> debian/rules build-arch
> debian/rules binary-arch
>
> I wrote a patch to fix this some time back, and it was discussed by the
> TC months ago. I guess it needs chasing up to get it applied. Once
> that's done, it will Just Work.
buildd can make the decision to run build-indep, I am ok with it.
What I am not ok with, is when buildd are setup to run build-indep
rules, but do not respect B-D-I !
That does not make any sense for me.
Anyway I have merged B-D-I into B-D, as suggested. And -2 seems to
compile just fine -well almost I need to B-D on doxygen-latex-
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
Reply to: