Re: RFS: libroxml
Ok, I think i understood it all.
last modifications are uploaded :
> But, like I said, this was just my curiosity asking. There's nothing
> wrong with sticking to 1.0.
I switched to 3.0 (better use lastest methods)
> Also, I didn't notice it in the previous package, and might be a new
> issue with the current one: the upstream orig.tar.gz contains compiled
> binaries, and built docs. Perhaps you may wish to clean those out. They
> make the tarball considerably bigger, and can present all kinds of
> issues while building the package.
You are right, this is a problem when trying to cross compile. It is corrected.