Re: RFS: libroxml

[Tristan Lelong <tristan.lelong@libroxml.net>]

Ok, I think i understood it all.

last modifications are uploaded :

>
>> http://debian.libroxml.net/libroxml_2.1.1-1.dsc
>

>
> But, like I said, this was just my curiosity asking. There's nothing
> wrong with sticking to 1.0.
>
I switched to 3.0 (better use lastest methods)


>
> Also, I didn't notice it in the previous package, and might be a new
> issue with the current one: the upstream orig.tar.gz contains compiled
> binaries, and built docs. Perhaps you may wish to clean those out. They
> make the tarball considerably bigger, and can present all kinds of
> issues while building the package.
>
You are right, this is a problem when trying to cross compile. It is corrected.

Regards