Re: Package separation/naming conventions
Ole Streicher <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> If it has a contrib/non-free build-dependency, the source package needs
>> to go to contrib as well. It cannot build binaries in main in that
> My problem here is: the source package contains libwcs which may be
> built (and used) completely without non-free dependencies, and libpgsbox
> which needs a non-free library to be built and used.
> Is there a way to get libwcs into main and libpgsbox into contrib?
You have two options, I think (hopefully someone will correct me, if I'm
* Either don't build the part which (build-)depends on non-free, and
don't ship it at all, then both the source and the resulting binaries
can be in main.
* Split the source package into two: one that contains and builds only
the completely free parts, and one that builds only the lib that'd go
Personally, I would go with the first option, unless libpgsbox is really
desperately needed, and splitting the source package is worth the
> Can I specify build-dependencies separately for each binary package?
Nope, you cannot.