Re: RFS: dwm

To: Jeremy Allard <elvis4526@gmail.com>, 639657-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "debian-mentors@lists.debian.org" <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RFS: dwm
From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:54:32 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110831055432.GA8208@master.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAJWcMcOMvPgL2dY=TmwospR3CcSfmBs0+ZDA0Kqn9NCRF5xGhA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAJWcMcOMvPgL2dY=TmwospR3CcSfmBs0+ZDA0Kqn9NCRF5xGhA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:14:17AM -0400, Jeremy Allard wrote:
> PS: I'm not really sure if it is te correct way to this. Please, correct me
> if i'm wrong. I know that dwm is already present in main, but its oudated
> and I have no news from the maintainer that i contacted by email a week ago.

It is not OK to orphan a package after one e-mail and one week.  Please read
"Dealing with inactive and/or unreachable maintainers" as described here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa

Regards,

Bart Martens

Reply to:

References:
- RFS: dwm
  - From: Jeremy Allard <elvis4526@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: RFS: dwm
Next by Date: Re: RFS: dwm
Previous by thread: RFS: dwm
Next by thread: Re: RFS: dwm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread