[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi Kilian

I did test the get-orig-source, in fact I used that to get the source that I built with. Perhaps, as you said, you have some default set up for wget that I do not have.

Since you have made an update, I need to get the updated file to check into my repository for future. Can you send it to me or let me know where to download it from. It is probably not available yet via apt-get source.

I notice that all the emails I have received refer to amd64. Do I have to upload an i386 version also to get it available on i386 systems? Or will debian automatically build it for all architectures? Only the tagbkup part is architecture dependent.

Thanks for all your help.

Regards

Peter


From: "Kilian Krause" <kilian@debian.org>
To: "Peter Bennett" <pgbennett@comcast.net>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:46:13 AM
Subject: Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Peter,

On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:17 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:16 -0400, Peter Bennett wrote:
> > I have repackaged the source, built, signed, uploaded
> >
> > Version is now 02.01.05+dfsg1-1
> >
> > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal
> > - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jampal/jampal_02.01.05+dfsg1-1.dsc
> >
> > If all is OK please upload it.
>
> your get-orig-source target doesn't work:
>
> 2011-07-27 09:06:03 (20.5 MB/s) - “jampal-source-02.01.05.tar.gz” saved
> [4197112/4197112]
>
> mv download jampal-source-02.01.05.tar.gz
> mv: cannot stat `download': No such file or directory
> make: *** [get-orig-source] Error 1
>
> The mv line is obviously not needed. Further the filename should be
> jampal_... not jampal-...

Thinking about this I guess that's me having --content-disposition in
wget args by default.

This should probably be added to your wget line.

--
Best regards,
Kilian


Reply to: