[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)



Hi Nikolaus,

On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 09:30 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 03:02 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Nikolaus,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:56 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >> dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.0.1-1.dsc
> > 
> > thanks for the update.
> > 
> > 1. Regarding the example scrips you ship I'm sort of undecided whether
> > they would actually fit better in examples rather than "contrib". I
> > guess yes.
> > 
> >  usr/share/doc/s3ql/contrib/benchmark.py
> >  usr/share/doc/s3ql/contrib/expire_backups.py
> >  usr/share/doc/s3ql/contrib/make_dummy.py
> >  usr/share/doc/s3ql/contrib/pcp.py
> 
> I don't quite agree. These are not examples of any sort, but programs
> that can be useful in combination with S3QL.

Then they are IMHO still wrong in *DOC* and belong into /usr/share/s3ql
(instead of /usr/share/doc/s3ql) - with or without a symlink
to /usr/bin.


> >  usr/share/doc/s3ql/contrib/s3ql_backup.sh
> 
> This could arguably be called an example, yes. But I think it would be
> nice to stick with the upstream layout (where all these are in contrib),
> so that people can use e.g. the online documentation (which explicitly
> refers to scripts in contrib).

in contrib under doc/?


> > 2. You symlink your contrib scripts from /usr/share/doc (!)
> > into /usr/bin which is not really the best solution out there. Please
> > decide whether these shall either go as examples (and not symlinked
> > to /usr/bin/) or whether they are official applications - in which case
> > they don't belong into /usr/share/doc.
> 
> Well, I think they are certainly not examples. I would be fine to put
> expire_backups and pcp into /usr/bin, but I think that benchmark.py and
> make_dummy.py are relatively unlikely to be called in day to day use, so
> I am hesitant to put them there.
> 
> How about putting the former into /usr/bin and symlinking them from
> /usr/share/doc/s3ql/contrib (i.e., to the links the other way around)?

If it's not share/doc/s3ql but share/s3ql I'm perfectly agreed with your
proposal. ;-)


-- 
Best regards,
Kilian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: