Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alexey,
On 09.06.2011 12:45, rhash.admin wrote:
> Ok, switched to 8th version for auto-running dpkg-gensymbols, but some
> DDs (on #d-mentor) prefer to package with 7th debhelper to simplify
> backporting.
That's right for oldstable. But Lenny is about to become obsolete in a
forseeable future and your package will most likely not enter Lenny
anyway. However for Squeeze dh 8 compatibility is fine [1]
>> * Your upstream sources are missing copyright headers. Please consider
>> adding them.
> There is already Copyleft license file! Why do I need to add Copyrights? :)
You can also add copyleft headers if you care about the wording :>
>> Your debian/copyright provides conflicting license headers. I'm aware
>> yor package is dual-licensed, see DEP-5 on how to specify such use
>> cases
> If it is not reported by lintian, then it doesn't look like official
> requirement. :)
Because DEP-5 is not a requirement at all. DEP-5 is a proposal on its
way to become an official standard which is then most likely reflected
in the policy. Until then Lintian probably won't croak (or care).
It is a good idea to start with DEP-5 for new packages but no
constraint. If you do, you should do it right though nonetheless. :)
Moreover Lintian is not omnipotent (in hope, Niels won't read that :))
and possibly has missing or incomplete checks.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debhelper.html
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=p+Ki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: