Re: DEP-5 format definition hell
"Andrew O. Shadoura" <bugzilla@tut.by> writes:
> It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
> debian/copyright.
I personally don't agree. I think DEP-5 is easier to read because it's
the same as every other package that uses DEP-5 (well, once we get the
format hammered out), so I can quickly find the information I need and
don't have to parse and understand hundreds of different ways of conveying
the same information.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: