[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: jampal



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Peter,

some comments about your package. Note I'm no DD, so I can't sponsor
you, therefore my suggestions may not be effectual for you. Note your
package is not distributable in Debian as is (see below).

* You built a native package, that's wrong (if you would have native
package you would know :)). Learn more on [1]

* You seem to use a merged changelog for your upstream changes and
Debian related changes. Note this is not the intention of
debian/changelog. The Debian changelog should highlight changes when
compared to the upstream (source) distribution [2].

* You seem not to have filed an ITP for your package. Please do that if
you want to introduce your application to Debian. This is to tell other
people someone is working on a given package to avoid waste of
resources. Learn more about ITPs on WNPP [3]

* You Standards version is outdated, please bump to 3.9.2(.0)

* Your binary dependencies are redundant (you have put openjdk-6-jre
twice) and you depend on lame. Lame is not in Debian and since you have
this as dependency, your package is not suitable at all to Debian. I'd
suggest you to use another (available) alternative. Moreover I'm not
entirely sure why you recommend Open-Office.org (maybe you could
elaborate?). There is no OpenOffice in Debian anymore - please depend on
Libre Office instead

* Your synopsis line needs some improvements. Notably it should start
with a lower case character [4]. Your long description reads fine, but
I'm unsure why it would make sense to point out you/one can manage
exactly 40k songs with it.

* Your maintainer script miss the DEBHELPER hook, please leave that
untouched from the template or add it again. Someone being familiar with
desktop applications might also be able to tell, whether a postinst
script is really supposed to call update-menu. afaict there is a hook
for it (but I'm unsure)

* You should rework your rules file. While it does not look terribly
wrong you are really suggested to use debhelper scripts, for instance to
install changelog (dh_installchangelogs), docs and so on. While doing
you could also think about switching to dh 8 (debhelper(7)/dh(1)). This
also includes to give the dpkg build tools a hint about your
compatibility mode (debian/compat file).

* You don't include a watch file [5]. This is not strictly required though.

* Your debian/copyright file looks good, but it seems to be a scary mix
between DEP-5 and traditional copyright files. It does not look entirely
wrong, but there are some files without copyright statement. You should
fix this for files you are authoritative (i.e. the author), e.g.
tagbkup/build.sh. How are files like ptts/pgbennett_speech_Speaker.h
generated?

* What is tagbkup/? That looks like a bundled library. It is a policy
violation to build a binary packages with bundled libraries. Moreover
this is C code and therefore not platform independent (you specified
architecture: any). Same may hold for other libraries/utilities you
bundle (§ 4,13 [6]).

* Your package is not Lintian clean:

W: jampal: menu-item-creates-new-section Applications/Sound & Video
/usr/share/menu/jampal:3
W: jampal: extra-license-file usr/share/jampal/COPYING
W: jampal source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4.0





[1]
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_difference_between_a_native_Debian_package_and_a_non-native_package.3F
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgchangelog
[3] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[4] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-descriptions
[5] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianwatch
/ uscan(1)
[6] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=OVUr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: