[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What to do about the situation with id3v2

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:29, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote:
>> In case you are thinking of dropping libid3, the following are the
>> reverse deps and reverse build-deps that would need to be ported or
>> dropped. You might want to talk to their maintainers and upstreams:
> [15 packages]
> But this is an argument to keep it.  Porting 15 packages to something else
> would be quite a bit of work.


> However, what if you made not the command line tool but the library a thin
> wrapper over a competing one?  That would require porting just once.

Someone also suggested this on IRC last night and I actually like the
idea, thanks!

Stefan Ott

"You are not Grey Squirrel?"

Reply to: