[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Help with lintian



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-04-02 10:11, Chris Carr wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm puzzled by this warning from lintian:
> 
> chrisc@xaphod:/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ lintian -Ivi --pedantic
> angband_3.2.0-1_i386.changes 
> N: Setting up lab in /tmp/esv0j1oUBP ...
> N: Processing 3 packages...
> N: ----
> N: Processing changes file angband_3.2.0-1_i386 (version 1:3.2.0-1) ...
> N: ----
> N: Processing source package angband (version 1:3.2.0-1) ...
> P: angband source:
> direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system .gitmodules and 7 more
[...]
> 
> ... is it possible to configure lintian to ignore .git*, like the -i
> option to dpkg-buildpackage?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> CC
> 
> 

Hi

Generally the diff ought not to include ".gitmodules" in the first place
if you did not intend for it (and the 7 other files) to be there.
  Most likely dpkg-source/dpkg-buildpackage with -i is not enough in
this case.  I believe [1] would solve your issue; maybe with a wishlist
bug against dpkg-dev asking for the vcs-related files to be ignored by
default.

Note: you should generally only ignore the files that are vcs-related or
auto-generated files, so please review the changes to files if they are
not clearly related to git (etc.).  If you deliberately modified one of
upstreams files, you should not ignore/filter that change.

~Niels

[1]
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/01/28/3-ways-to-not-clutter-your-debian-source-package-with-autogenerated-files/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=TPI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: