In <[🔎] 20110117074140.GA16330@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote: >[Y]ou should NOT maintain the debian/ >directory in the upstream source tree (for several reasons discussed >several times before). That's not a problem. Release tarballs (including snapshots) should just not contain the debian/ directory. Older source formats produce a lot of noise when a debian/ directory is present in the orig.tar.gz. Even if "3.0 (quilt)" ignores the debian/ directory, it is a bit misleading to users of source packages are not interested in details. In fact, if upstream wants to take an active hand in preparing policy- compliant and release-ready packages, it may be best to use upstream resources to manage the package. Contrary-wise, a half-baked debian/ directory, even if it only appears in the upstream VCS is not really useful to anyone. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.