Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

[Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>]

On 09/01/11 14:45, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tony Houghton<h@realh.co.uk>  writes:
>
> >     I RFSd 1.20.1-1 about a week ago but it was overlooked and I received
> > a patch this weekend so instead of pinging my previous RFS I created a
> > new version and merged the debian/changelog entries for 1.20.1-1 through
> > 1.20.3-1 as the earlier 1.20.* versions were not released. The latest
> > version is to ensure that the package doesn't require po4a to build from
> > a release tarball.
>
> I was checking this package.  I found that the changelog entries seem
> messed up, in a way that old entries and new entries are mixed together.
>
> Please tidy up the changelogs then I will upload it.

Do you mean the Debian changelog or upstream? I can't see a problem with
either, please could you show an example of where entries have been
mixed up.

--
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk