Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)

[Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>]

I don't think that is the appropriate way to deal with this
puiparts-detected problem.

Firstly, why does the package need an empty file at
/etc/fdclone/fd2rc.siteconfig?

Secondly, the postrm should only remove that file, not all of /etc/fdclone/.

Thirdly, your changelog entries are not particularly useful to users,
you might want to read devref 6.3:

http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise