[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)



On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:50:53 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
>> henceforth I am attaching the diff from the present version in
>> sid/squeeze for your kind review
>>
> Looks ok for a freeze exception.  Please let -release know when the
> package is accepted in the archive.

Please fix the following issues and I will upload it:

Please close the relevant Launchpad bugs in the changelog using (LP:
#1234) so that once Ubuntu syncs the package, the relevant bugs will
be automatically closed. You can find the relevant Launchpad bugs in
the upstream git log.

You also added a love poem in 'debian/new file', I would suggest that
is not useful in a source package and should be removed, cute though
it is :)

The following issues are not blockers for this upload:

Since upstream uses autotools, you can use 'make distcheck' to create
the tarball in debian/rules get-orig-source. Then let upstream know if
that fails or produces a different tarball than what you need for
Debian. The default upstream tarball format seems to be .tar.bz2 so
you will need to add a bunzip2 > ...tar.bz2 | gzip -9 > ...tar.gz to
the process at least until post-squeeze when you could switch to
dpkg-source v3 (IIRC the release team prefers not to unblock
dpkg-source format version changes).

I just noticed that the version number is incorrect since upstream
hasn't bumped the version in configure.ac, please talk to upstream
about that. Probably the version number needs to be autogenerated
based on the date of the latest git commit when the tarball is
generated with "make distcheck".

The upstream source still contains references to SVN, but it is now
maintained in git, you might want to poke them about that.

Upstream might want to look at CC0, which is a more internationalised
version of CC-PD.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


Reply to: