Re: dfsg bit in the package name
* Tomasz Muras <tomasz@muras.eu> [100824 19:34]:
> So to summarize:
> dfsg is a conventional way of naming a package, when the original
> source has been changed. It usually happens when upstream software
> contains some non-free elements.
I do not think using "dfsg" makes sense if it was not repacked to
remove non-dfsg-free stuff.
For other reasons I think "ds" is sometimes chosen. (Though there
are not really that many other legitimate reasons).
Bernhard R. Link
Reply to: