On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote: > I personally can't think of any situation where ~dfsg is useful. If I want to rebuild a package including the non-free bits, I could just remove the "~dfsg" from the version and have it win over the one the official repository. Still, it is not nice to have some packages using "+dfsg" and some "~dfsg", as it creates confusion. Ciao, Ludovico