[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java



Hi Tony,

I re-uploaded the package and I tried to fix all the issues you gave me.

The source package now builds 3 binary packages :
- libservice-wrapper-java - Jar daemon wrapper java libraries
- libservice-wrapper-jni - Jar daemon wrapper JNI libraries
- service-wrapper - Jar daemon wrapper

I hope the names to be compliant with the policy.

I wrote a manpage for the launcher and removed th curious -Dbits=32 option.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/service-wrapper-java
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/service-wrapper-java/service-wrapper-java_3.5.3-2.dsc

Thanks,


Rémi Debay,


ACGCenter

Synergie Park Des Bonnettes
2, rue Willy Brandt
62000 Arras, France

Ligne directe : +33 (0)3 21 15 36 36

www.acgcenter.com


On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> wrote:
On Mon Aug 09 18:08, Rémi Debay wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> it's a daemon launcher for a jar file so i may say it is a program. I have 3
> files : a binary launcher, a jar libary and a jni library.
> What about naming three packages ?
>  - libservice-wrapper-java (library) arch all
>  - libservice-wrapper-jni (jni library) arch i386, amd64...
>  and service-wrapper-java for the binary launcher.(arch i386, amd64...)

Do you expect anyone else to use your .jar file in their program? Or is
everything just interaction by running the script?

Matt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=SMYg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: