Re: RFS: (RC bugfix, NMU) mindi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 11/28/2010 05:26 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>>>> Are you willing to prepare a new NMU implementing this ?
>>> I don't think so. Anyway, *thanks* a lot for the review!
>> Well; we'll have to agree to disagree then. I will propose one with my
> Hi Bilal,
> FYI, I got this uploaded as NMU some minutes ago:
> Cheers, OdyX
Now, you just managed to anger me by doing this.
First, what is the harm in adding these files to debian/conffiles?
The only difference from the earlier package would be:
1) These files would be removed only on purge.
2) There would be no need of a postrm file.
This was the needed behavior, and this approach was the Debian-policy
recommended way of getting the job done.
Secondly, if I had tagged the bug with pending, then I was the person
who was supposed to fix the bug! And, you just got the thing NMUed
without any consent from me.
Sorry if my mail was too harsh.
Bilal Akhtar - Ubuntu Developer, yet still 14 years old.
More information about him can be found on
IRC nick: bilalakhtar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----