[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: taskcoach - useful task manager - new - python app



2010/11/8 Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010, Alejandro Garrido Mota wrote:
>> > My motivation for maintaining this package is: I use this application
>> > like my personal task manager,.
>> >
>> > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>> > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/taskcoach
>> > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>> > main contrib non-free
>> > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/taskcoach/taskcoach_1.2.2-1.dsc
>>
>> Just downloaded it to have a quick look and noticed that it build-depends
>> on libcurl3-dev. Why?
>>
>> Even for an "initial release", you can put some comments in
>> debian/changelog explaining your initial packaging choices and the
>> unusual work you did (writing/applying a patch falls in this category).
>
> Also /usr/share/pyshared/taskcoachlib/thirdparty contains python code
> grabbed from third parties, i.e. those are embedded libraries and we
> try to avoid those in particular if they have already been packaged
> separately in Debian.
>
> You want to check those one by one and use the officially packaged variant
> when it exists (i.e. replacing the files with symlinks towards the
> official package).
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer ◈ [Flattr=20693]
>
> Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
>                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)
>

Done, I have fixed and included all suggestions. The package is
up-to-date in my git repository and mentors. Thanks you.

PD: I don't remember why I put libcurl3-dev, but I check and it
doesn't seem necessary
-- 
http://www.mogaal.com
Ing Eléctrica - Universidad Simón Bolívar
GNU/Linux Debian SID
Usuario Linux registrado #386758
GPG Key Fingerprint = F6A7 EF7E 4688 70C6 6B37  A8EF F6B0 9645 B24B F200


Reply to: