Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some package" is
Asheesh: Sounds like you got a feature request for Debexpo!
Currently we got a list of "unanswered" list emails at ; though it
has a couple of issues (not limited to it not updating regularly). It
also creates a number of false-positives (e.g. "nanoblogger-extra" was
also handled in the reply to the "nanoblogger" email, but detecting this
I can try to extend this script to be more suited for this purpose.
So I have no idea why this script isn't running properly.
/me looks into it
Oh, hey, I fixed it. It'll run every night and update now. The problem was
that my cron job called "make -q" not "make --quiet".
I think that, as far as false positives: we should just reply to all the
messages. For better or for worse, people will look at mailing list
archives and get a feel for what our community is like. (That's my
It's clear to me that the source code to this cron job should be somewhere
public. Let's see...
Anyway -- that's all for that from me for now!
A tall, dark stranger will have more fun than you.