Re: RFS: compactheader
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
El 02/09/10 23:07, Rogério Brito escribió:
> Hi.
>
> On Sep 02 2010, Williams Orellana wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "compactheader".
>
>
> A quick follow up to comment on your package:
>
> * Please, package version 1.2.4.
working on it
>
> * Are you sure that the license is MPL-1.1+ and not the tri-license?
at least that's what it says the website of the addon
>
> * Your packaging is under the GPL-3+ and this will cause any changes
> that you make to not be able to be pushed upstream (say that you
> produce a patch).
>
> Please, consider always having the packaging in the same terms as the
> upstream software, even if you would prefer another license.
considering this point
>
> * The short description should start with a lowercase letter.
working on it
>
> * Your watch file doesn't seem to work:
>
> ,----
> | rbrito@chagas:/tmp/compactheader-1.2.3$ uscan --report-status
> | uscan warning: In debian/watch,
> | no matching hrefs for watch line
> | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/downloads/file/92157/xpi/compactheader\-([\d\.]*)\-tb\.xpi debian xpi-repack
> | rbrito@chagas:/tmp/compactheader-1.2.3$
> `----
>
> It took me some time to figure out the better solution to use with
> mozilla addons. Just look into
>
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/addons/13564/
>
> Be careful to regard the betas as lower than the final releases.
> Something like mangling the upstream version with s/beta/~beta/
> works.
working on it too
>
> * A more philosophical question is that of using xpi-repack to pack an
> extension: that simply seems to me like packaging the binary product
> of a program and not using the source code.
you're right that's the correct way
>
> I did this with the packages that I mentioned on my earlier e-mail,
> but I still think that this is wrong.
>
>
> Regards,
>
Thanks for all the comments are always welcome :)
Cheers!!
- --
.''`. Williams Orellana
: :' : http://williamsorellana.org
`. `'` 4096R/0FCFE54C
`- EEA4 00D1 9C76 E84F D261 E04D A70A C4A1 0FCF E54C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=GGWc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: