[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: faenza-icon-theme



Hello :)

> What about the other parts? Just to have an idea of where this is going to...

It was always my personal opinion that when it comes to themes Debian
was always a superb distro, but it always seemed looks were
disregarded. I believe Squeeze is one of the most important releases
in Debian history and it's time to change its look?

I had an idea to even propose overall look for Squeeze (including
video) I first wanted to get all the components into the Debian before
I start proposing anything.

http://foolcontrol.org/img/abs%20faenza.png

Plan is to put as much as these eye candy things into Debian, If it
doesn't make into Squeeze, I'll make unofficial package with the
website where once installed it'll change from your GRUB theme to
Icons/GTK theme + if there's Compiz including compiz effects with
transparent menus.

That's why I wanted to make that video :)

> * One of the first things was that the long description of the package
>  has its lines split.
>
>  Any particular reason for that? That's annoying. Are you trying to
>  circumvent the lintian message that your long description may be too
>  short?
>
>  You can surely put some other text there to give the users a better
>  idea of what the theme is about (and it being beautiful would be bad
>  if skipped).
>
> * You state in the debian/copyright file that the license is GPL, but
>  the text is GPLv3+ and you provide instructions for the user saying
>  that the text of the GPL on Debian systems is under a versioned name.
>
>  It is better to make everything versioned here.
>
> * You claim copyright on the Debian packaging, but what is the license?
>  If you don't specify it, then it is possible to interpret that your
>  work mixed with the upstream GPL is not distributable.
>
>  A usual thing to do is to make your changes be the same as the rest of
>  the package (with the added side effect that your changes can be
>  integrated upstream easily).
>
> * The index.theme file in the Faenza directory says that it inherits
>  Humanity, ubuntu-mono-light, gnome. What about recommending/suggesting
>  those packages, depending on the status of their Freedomness?

I tried to fix all the things you mentioned here, please check the
re-uploaded package. Please do let me know if anything else requires
changes.


Adnan


2010/8/31 Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>:
> Hi there.
>
> On Aug 30 2010, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>> * URL             : [http://tiheum.deviantart.com/art/Faenza-Icons-173323228]
>
> I just did a quick look and you are right that this theme is indeed
> beautiful.
>
>> My motivation for maintaining this package is: [I want to build a
>> whole theme, and these icons are part of it. IMHO these are most
>> popular and most sexy icons right now, it would be great if they were
>> in Debian officially].
>
> What about the other parts? Just to have an idea of where this is going to...
>
>> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/faenza-icon-theme/faenza-icon-theme_0.7.dsc
>
> IANADD, but I took a few minutes to see what you did.
>
> * One of the first things was that the long description of the package
>  has its lines split.
>
>  Any particular reason for that? That's annoying. Are you trying to
>  circumvent the lintian message that your long description may be too
>  short?
>
>  You can surely put some other text there to give the users a better
>  idea of what the theme is about (and it being beautiful would be bad
>  if skipped).
>
> * You state in the debian/copyright file that the license is GPL, but
>  the text is GPLv3+ and you provide instructions for the user saying
>  that the text of the GPL on Debian systems is under a versioned name.
>
>  It is better to make everything versioned here.
>
> * You claim copyright on the Debian packaging, but what is the license?
>  If you don't specify it, then it is possible to interpret that your
>  work mixed with the upstream GPL is not distributable.
>
>  A usual thing to do is to make your changes be the same as the rest of
>  the package (with the added side effect that your changes can be
>  integrated upstream easily).
>
> * The index.theme file in the Faenza directory says that it inherits
>  Humanity, ubuntu-mono-light, gnome. What about recommending/suggesting
>  those packages, depending on the status of their Freedomness?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
> http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
> DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
>


Reply to: