Re: RFS: archivemount (new package, 2nd try)
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:02:15PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 09.07.2010 20:44, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:12:52PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> >> Am 09.07.2010 20:08, schrieb Nanakos Chrysostomos:
> >>>> * Why is urgency set to high in the changelog ?
> >>> For faster inclusion to the sid environment. This thing has to be tested
> >>> and ten days or more is a loss of time I think.
> >> That's wrong.
> >> It needs 10 testing days in sid, before it migrates to testing, so that
> >> your package could be tested and so that it does not damage testing etc.
> >> Bumping the urgency to high is only valid for fixing release critical
> >> and security related bugs in _testing_.
> > I've got it. So it is mistaken to bump the urgency to high for this
> > package. Am I supposed to upload it again with urgency to low in mentors
> > site or the sponsor can do it?
> Just reupload.
> Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
> Patrick Matthäi
> GNU/Linux Debian Developer
> E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Always if we think we are right,
> we were maybe wrong.