[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Subject: RFS: nall



On 27 April 2010 07:23, ben <brouits@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> The package appears to be lintian clean, but is missing a manpage
> and may have useless generated deps provided by dh tools.

Hi, thanks for packaging nall.

However, the package does not build in a clean chroot:  It needs at
least intltool as a build dependency, and then some GTK stuff.  And it
needs a manpage.

Oh, and if you are not reading debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, please
state that in your post so we know that we should reply directly.

Cheers,
-- 
                                                    Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?


Reply to: