Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)
I dislike the duplication and the iceweasel/mozilla style license.
That said it is not my role to decide about uploading ttf-takao or
It is a shame IPA doesn't use standard FLOSS practices like releasing
early and often.
1. I also dislike DFSG #4 a lot. At least it isn't the SIL OFL, which
prevents us from building the binary font file from source in the case
where the author has specified a reserved font name.