Re: RFS: go
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dominique Dumont
<dominique.dumont@hp.com> wrote:
> How about naming this package go-compiler ?
>
> This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
> computer language is implicit.
I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
and if another implementation is ever created, it could be called
something-else-go.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: go
- From: Joachim Wiedorn <ad_debian@joonet.de>
- References:
- RFS: go
- From: Ivan Wong <ivanwyc@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: go
- From: Ivan Wong <ivanwyc@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: go
- From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: go
- From: Dominique Dumont <dominique.dumont@hp.com>