Re: RFS: go

[Ivan Wong <ivanwyc@gmail.com>]

Hi Dominique,

Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?

Thanks,
-Ivan.

Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
>> * Package name    : go
>>   Version         : 2010.03.15-1
>>   Upstream Author : Google
>> * URL             : http://golang.org/
>> * License         : BSD Style
>>   Section         : devel
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> go         - Google's Go programming language compiler
> 
> Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the 
> venerable go game.
> 
> May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired from  
> the web site name)
> 
> HTH
> 
> Dominique
> --
> http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
> http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont


-- 
Ivan Wong <ivanwyc@gmail.com>
GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7