Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dne Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:39:10 +0100
Gabriele Giacone <email@example.com> napsal(a):
> Actual before or after our choice? We are redistributing it and we can
> choose whether releasing it under version 2 or 3.
> "What reason for that?" Why not?
> Is GPL-2 better than GPL-3? I'm trying to understand differences between
For example because GPL-3 is not compatible with GPL-2 by itself. So
once the code is under GPL-3 you can not use it in GPL-2 licensed
Also I don't see reason why you should limit Debian users from use the
program under terms of GPL-2.
> >>> Why do you install startup script to usr/share/sweethome3d and create
> >>> symlink in usr/bin? I think it should be directly in usr/bin.
> >> I already did it for jxplorer: link without .sh extension under /usr/bin
> >> that refers to the script under share/<application>
> >> /usr/bin/sweethome3d -> ../share/sweethome3d/sweethome3d.sh
> >> I like it but we can talk about it.
> > Well I feel the symlink and different location is useless, but
> I'd like to use <package>.install or dh_install but they don't rename
> files. Possibly without "install -d/install" stuff.
> And sweethome3d.jar was also feeling alone under /usr/share/sweethome3d ;)
Okay, this is just matter of preferences.
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----