Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100
Gabriele Giacone <email@example.com> napsal(a):
> On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say
> > so). Please fix it in debian/copyright.
> "you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU
> General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
> either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version."
> At our option, we can choose GPL-3+, can't we?
What would be the reason for that?
Yes, technically you can, but you are supposed to describe actual
license in debian/copyright.
> > Why is needed 01noMacOSX? All MacOSX code seems to be behind if, so it
> > should be safe to stay, or am I wrong?
> Removed some references to MacOSX code. Without those removals, build
> fails due to classes included in AppleJavaExtension.jar which I didn't
> replace. I didn't take a deeper look at it.
I would be good idea to document this in patch description. It's always
good to mention why the patch is needed when it is not obvious.
> > Why do you install startup script to usr/share/sweethome3d and create
> > symlink in usr/bin? I think it should be directly in usr/bin.
> I already did it for jxplorer: link without .sh extension under /usr/bin
> that refers to the script under share/<application>
> /usr/bin/sweethome3d -> ../share/sweethome3d/sweethome3d.sh
> I like it but we can talk about it.
Well I feel the symlink and different location is useless, but
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----